Specifically Authorized Projects - Program Overview

Projects specifically authorized by Congress allow the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide support for a variety of water resources related issues. These projects differ in two ways from other program authorities. First, to initiate a study, the USACE requires specific Congressional authorization to address issues within a specified area. Second, the study scope can include one or more different USACE mission areas and the total study cost is not limited.

Expand List item 41739Collapse List item 41739  
Reconnaissance Phase:
+

After receiving authority from Congress through a Resolution, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can initiate a study within the specified river basin, watershed, or navigation area.  The USACE is initially funded with up to $100,000 to draft and submit a reconnaissance level report to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Civil Works (ASA[CW]).  The reconnaissance report will identify potential problems and opportunities, the feasibility of imple­menting a project, and identify the Corps of Engineers mission area(s) the project may fall under.  The result of the phase is a determination regarding the potential federal interest in the project and, if appropriate, an approval to move into the feasibility phase from the ASA(CW).

Expand List item 41740Collapse List item 41740  
Feasibility Phase:
+

During the feasibility phase, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducts an in-depth analysis of the project area and further defines the existing and future conditions to be evaluated.  An economic and environmental analysis is completed dem­onstrating potential benefits and impacts as a result of implementing a project.  During this phase extensive review and analysis is performed to ensure that the best project(s) are being pursued.  A range of alternatives are often considered and may result in federal and local plans.  The feasibility report is the final deliverable prepared at the end of the phase and is a decision document that includes a 35 percent design of the recommended plan(s) for implementation and an environmental impacts analysis, typically in the form of an environmental impact statement.  The report and its find­ings are reviewed by the ASA(CW) and, if approved, recommended to Congress for approval in the form of a Chief of Engineers’ Report.  At this point, any further design or analysis requires Congressional action and approval typically through a Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) bill.

The feasibility phase is cost-shared 50/50 with the local sponsor and can include cash contributions, work in-kind, or a combination of both.  This phase typically last several years and varies in cost and size depending on the type and complexity of the project.

Expand List item 41741Collapse List item 41741  
Pre-Construction Engineering and Design Phase:
+

Following the feasibility phase and authorization from Congress through legislation, a project recommended for implementation may enter the Pre-Construction Engineering and De­sign (PED) phase.  During PED, design of the Congressionally authorized project is advanced from 35 to 100 percent design, including the full set of plans and specifications.  The project again will go through an extensive review process depending on the type and complexity of the project. 

The PED phase cost-share is 75 percent federal and 25 percent non-federal.  Though ultimately, the cost-share of the PED phase is subject to the cost-share percentages of the construction phase.  Construction cost-share is dependent on the type of project to be built.  For example, a flood risk management project is 65 percent federal and 35 percent non-federal.  Differences in cost-share from the PED phase are reconciled during construction and the project sponsor may be responsible for additional costs beyond the 25 percent initially required to complete the phase in order to maintain the appropriate match.

Expand List item 41742Collapse List item 41742  
Construction Phase:
+

Following completion of 100% design and the plans and specifications, the project is ready to move forward with construction.  A Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) must be executed between the Corps of Engi­neers and the project sponsor.  It is not uncommon for the project sponsor to change from phase to phase depending on the local interest and real estate property needs.  The PPA outlines all of the terms and conditions of construction of the project including but not limited to cost-share ratios, contracting actions, and construction supervision.  Prior to construction, the local sponsor(s) of the project must also provide all lands, easements, rights-of-ways, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD) necessary to begin and complete the project.  The cost of LERRD incurred by the sponsor is applied to the sponsor’s cost-share requirement and may reduce but not eliminate the total cash requirements needed to execution.  Dependent on the availability of federal funding, the construction phase could initiate immediately follow­ing completion of the PED phase. 

The cost-share for construction varies from project to project based on the Corps of Engineers mission area it falls under.

Expand List item 41743Collapse List item 41743  
Operations, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R):
+

After a project is completed, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers turns over all operations and maintenance of the project to the local sponsor(s).  The costs of any required OMRR&R are 100% non-federal costs once construction is completed with the exception of projects that fall under the mission of harbors and inland navigation.  Navigation projects are maintained 100 percent by the Corps of Engineers up to depths of 45 feet and cost-share 50/50 at depths that exceed 45 feet.  As part of the PED phase and during construction, an operations and maintenance manual is developed for use in any OMRR&R activities. 

Types of Specifically Authorized Projects

Overview:

Ecosystem restoration activities examine the condition of existing ecosystems and determine the feasibility of restor­ing degraded ecosystem structure, function, and dynamic processes to a less degraded, natural condition.  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ ecosystem restoration program seeks to provide a comprehensive approach for addressing the problems associated with disturbed and degraded ecological resources.  USACE activities in ecosystem restoration concentrate on engineering solutions to water related land re­source problems.  The principal focus is on those ecological resources and process that are directly associated with the hydrologic regime of the ecosystem and watershed.

Cost-Share:

The cost-share during construction for ecosystem restoration projects is 65% federal and 35% non-federal.  The sponsor may wish to implement elements of the project not authorized by Congress at a 100% cost to the sponsor.  Any locally preferred measures to be implemented must still be reviewed and approved by USACE, have complete environmental compliance documentation and permits, and be contracted and built through USACE contracting policies.

Overview:

Despite the efforts of federal, state, tribal, and local interests to reduce flood damages, flooding still accounts for 90 percent of all natural disaster damage in the United States. Flooding forces hundreds of thousands of people to flee their homes and places or work annually. The purpose of flood risk management is to help reduce the risk of flood dam­age through the use of structural or non-structural methods or a combination of both.

Structural Measures:

Structural measures are physical modifications designed to reduce the frequency of damaging levels of flood inundation. Structural flood risk management measures include levees, flood walls, channel modifica­tions, or dams and reservoirs.

Non-Structural Measures:

Non-structural measures reduce flood damage risks without significantly altering the na­ture or extent of the flooding by changing the use of floodplains or by accommodating existing uses to the flood hazard. Non-structural measures include modifying homes and business by elevating structures out of the floodplain or flood warning systems.

Cost-Share:

The cost-share for flood risk management projects authorized by Congress during construction is 65% federal and 35% non-federal.  The sponsor may wish to implement elements of the project not authorized by Congress at a 100% cost to the sponsor.  Any locally preferred measures to be implemented must still be re­viewed and approved by the USACE, have complete environmental compliance documentation and permits, and be contracted and built through USACE contracting policies.

Overview:

Facilities for hydroelectric power are also primarily the responsibility of non-federal interests.  However, the Corps of Engineers may include hydroelectric power development in multipurpose projects when it complements the major ob­jectives of flood risk management or navigation.  Power generators and related equipment may be built into dams and reservoirs as integral parts of those projects.

Cost-Share:

The cost-share for hydroelectric options is subject to the same cost-share for the primary Corps mission area the primary project is being constructed under.

Overview:

Navigation is a primary mission area for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as the federal agency responsible for maintaining, cre­ating, and regulating all traffic on the Nation’s waterways. USACE is authorized to plan and construct new navigation channels and structures (such as locks and dams, jetties, breakwaters, etc.), as well as perform dredging activities to ensure the Nation’s harbors and waterways remain safe, reliable, and efficient for commerce. Navigation projects and studies focus on commercial trade activities that support a strong and growing economy.

Cost-Share:

The cost-share during construction for harbor navigation projects varies depending on the depth of the water.  For projects in water 20 feet of less, the cost-share is 80% federal and 20% non-federal.  In waters between 20 and 45 feet in depth, the cost-share is 65% federal and 35% non-federal.  In waters greater than 45 feet in depth, the cost-share is 40 percent federal and 60% non-federal.  The cost-share for inland navigation projects is 100 percent federal.  Additionally, Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) of navigation projects is 100% federal, except in depths greater than 45 feet where the cost-share becomes 50/50 for the portion of the work below 45 feet.

Overview:

Development of outdoor recreation facilities at USACE projects dates back to the 1944 Flood Control Act.  With about 4,400 recreation areas at over 400 projects, there are more than 500 million annual recreation days of public use at our recreation facilities, providing a variety of opportunities for picnicking, camping, swimming, boating, hunting, fishing, and other pastimes.  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers may include recreational pieces to a multipurpose project when it comple­ments a primary focus of flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, or navigation.

Cost-Share:

The cost-share for the planning, design, and implementation of all recreational facilities is split 50/50 with the local sponsor.

Overview:

Providing municipal and industrious water supply is primarily the responsibility of non-federal interests.  However, under the authority of the Water Supply Act of 1958, we may, at the request of local interests, include water supply storage in new projects and may modify existing projects to provide new or additional storage.

Cost-Share:

For projects focusing on agricultural uses, the cost-share during construction is 65 percent federal and 35 percent non-federal.  For municipal and industrial water supply, the cost is 100 percent non-federal during construction.

Overview:

Watershed management planning studies focus on the development, use, monitoring, regulation, and preservation of land and water resources within a specific watershed. A watershed study will develop a framework of implementa­tion strategies and recommended actions that could be implemented throughout the watershed. Unlike other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ studies, these studies can often identify actions for watershed improvement that are beyond the scope and authority of USACE.

Cost-Share:

Cost-share for watershed management studies is 50/50 and may include cash contributions, work in-kind or a combination of both.